Katherine J. Hunzinger, Erik W. Sanders, Horace E. Deal, Jody L. Langdon, Kelsey M. Evans, Brandy A. Clouse, Barry A. Munkasy, Thomas A. Buckley
Hunzinger et al., J Clin Transl Res 2020; 5(S4): 4
Published online: April 16, 2020
Abstract
Background: Emerging evidence suggests neurophysiological deficits, such as visual motor coordination, may persist beyond clinical concussion recovery. Instrumented measurement of upper-limb visual motor coordination is critical for neurological evaluation post-concussion and may identify persistent deficits further elucidating persistent neurophysiological impairments not detected by the current clinical assessment battery.
Aim: To determine if a visual motor coordination test identifies persistent deficits in concussed collegiate student-athletes who have returned to baseline on clinical concussion assessments.
Methods: 13 recently concussed intercollegiate student-athletes (male: 7, 18.9 + 0.7 years, 175.5 + 12.4 cm, 75.5 + 23.2 kg), and 13 matched control student-athletes (male: 7, 19.3 + 1.1 years, 173.5 + 11.9 cm, 75.8 + 19.9 kg) completed two testing sessions (T1: <48 hours after clinical recovery; T2: 30 days post-concussion) on a visual motor exam. The outcome measures were A* Average score (average number of lights hit on A* exam), simple visual reaction time (SVRT-RT), and movement time (SVRT-MT) on the Dynavision D2. The dependent variables were compared with a 2 (Group) x 2 (Time) repeated measures ANOVAs.
Results: There was no group interaction in A* average score (F(1,24)=0.036, p=.849), SVRT-RT (F(1,22)=0.319, p=.575) and SVRT-MT (F(1,22)=1.179, p=.188). There was a main effect for time on A* average score (T1: 76.3 + 10.4 hits; T2: 82.7 + 11.2 hits; F(1,24)=38.1, p<.001) and SVRT-RT (T1: 0.31 + 0.04; T2: 0.29 + 0.04 s; F(1,22)=4.9, p=.039). There was no main effect for SVRT-MT. There were no group differences at either time point.
Conclusions: Among recently concussed collegiate student-athletes, no persistent deficits were identified in visual motor coordination beyond clinical recovery when assessed by Dynavision D2. This visual motor coordination exam may not provide a useful means of tracking recovery following concussion likely due to a substantial practice effect.
Relevance for patients: While post-concussion neurophysiological deficits persist beyond clinical recovery, the laboratory based VMC assessment herein did not identify deficits at critical post-concussion time points. Therefore, other clinically translatable VMC assessments should be further investigated.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18053/jctres.05.2020S4.004
Author affiliation
1 Department of Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE.
2 Interdisciplinary Biomechanics and Movement Science Program, University of Delaware, Newark, DE.
3 Department of Athletics, Ohio Northern University, Ada, OH.
4 Department of Intercollegiate, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA.
5 Vision Source Signature Eye Care, Statesboro, GA.
6 Department of Health Sciences and Kinesiology, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA.
7 The Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC.
* Corresponding author
Thomas A. Buckley
Department of Kinesiology and Applied Physiology,
University of Delaware,
349 STAR Tower, 100 Discovery Blvd., Newark, DE 19716
Phone: (302) 831-4783.
Fax: (302) 831-0341.
Email: TBuckley@UDel.edu
Handeling Editor:
Nicholas G Murray
University of Nevada, Reno School of Community Health Sciences
Neuromechanics Laboratory, United States
Downloads
Full text PDF
Review process file (180.9 KB)
